Thursday, September 24, 2009

Fwd: Re: Double offset butterfly valve with metal seat

Pl. read catalogs for more understanding.

The subject of seating in double ot triple offset butterfly is litte bigger than other valves due to the emphasis given to the application and operating conditions.

There are quit a few proprietary seat designs. For eg. the graphite layers gets eroded in few weeks to months due to operating condition resulting in big leak and pressure drops. The profile of the seat and disc is also important which developes the cavitation effect and pitting of the seat. So in the selection of a seat the operating condition such as the opening angle, pressure, which in turn will affect the operating pressure in turn the system design itself. So a well thought process is essential in the butterfly valve type and seat selection.

In solid seat the cost makes the big difference.

Regards,
Kannan

--- In piping_valves@yahoogroups.com, "ashoksiva1982" <ashoksiva1982@> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have an enquiry for Double offset butterfly with metal seat. The design pressure shall be 40 bar. Can any one know the seating arrangement of competitor valves.
>
> I got some information from the below link. I need some more arrangement for the above requirements.
>
> http://www.sz-yll.cn/upload/814/200631485558638680174.pdf

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

UL LISTED/FM APPROVED Valves fro fire water network(Sea Water) Options

There are quit a no. of vendors with FM/UL in the market.
 
However I would suggest Mapag GmbH, having UL certification for a wider size range and for all kind of standard designs.
Even Tyco has only upto 12" with UL.
 
Regards
Kannan
 
 
Respected Sirs,
In our project, we have fire water network(sea water used as fire water).
As per requirements, all valves shall be UL LISTED/FM APPROVED.
we have valves sizes ranges from 2" to 30"- we require almost more than 2500 valves.
 
May i have list of vendors from USA,UK or EUROPE who can  supply these valves.
Your esteeem reply ill be highly appreciated.
 
from
Ashok

Welding qualification of very low sulfur steels.

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: kannan_cit <kannan_cit@yahoo.com>
To: piping_valves@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:26:46 PM
Subject: [piping_valves] Welding qualification of very low sulfur steels.

 

Quit some time ago, I was having great difficulty in finding mills manufacturing steels with sulfur limited to 0.001% max. due to a wrong prescription by one of the well known PMC. Though it was resolved with higher relaxation later, I started to look into the issues concerning the restrictions posed in the sulfur content in steels, which were mainly added to increase the machinabilty, in various applications including the H2S/Sour service applications. The article in the link provides an insight in welding a low sulfur material.

The issue in the context of welding is that, while sulfur content is reduced the surface tension is reduced resulting in wider concave welds with lesser penetration, which pose a problem in thick walled pipes which are common in sour services. The insert ring solution proposed in the link below may solve the problem of higher weld penetration, which calls for different weld procedure. Similar to ASME BPE standard's prescription of limitation on, weld sulfur with appropriate quality check, does such requirement called in the BPV.

I seek our member's suggestion on the subject of welding procedure qualification, in such applications where sulfur content is restricted from 0.002% to 0.010% in sour/H2S applications.

http://www.thefabri cator.com/ tubepipefabricat ion/tubepipefabr ication_article. cfm?ID=533

With regards,
Kannan

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

Monday, June 22, 2009

Hydrogen Embrittlement on metals.

Though the subject is quit huge to discuss, I would like add few morepoints though not all.

1) The purity level of the Hydrogen is also categorised as less than 99% ormore than 99%.
2) The pressure is one important element(hardly addressed during designphase by material engineers), for less than 99% purity which means amixture, the partial pressure should be >1bar for the hydrogen to have itsshow.
3) Limits are present for Carbon monoxide and Oxygen and other elements aswell, which induces the phenomenon described by you(Owen).
4) Whether the system is under cyclic condition or not which applies to PSA and likes.
5) Materials are defined by their yield and tensile strengths limitations.Take note the equipment material prescription varies differently frompiping material for the same conditions.
6) Not the least though, Hydrogen embrittlement should not be equated withHydrogen induced cracking.

Coming to the point of temperature, linked to materials, considering carbonsteel as the material of constr., for eg. A well known refinerylicensor prescribes the temp. limitation at 260 deg.C, A German company holding numerous technologies in the subject of Hydrogen limits the use of Carbon steel to 200 deg.C, A UK Engg. company having H2 licenses, limits it to 240 deg.C. As I had seen lab test reports andfound H2 effects above 200 deg.C, such variation of 200 to 260 is quit abig gap under standard test procedures.

Let me know the thoughts of our groups on the temperature factor, what could be the reasoning behind such broader limits.

Some useful links for members interested further study.
http://www.uni-saarland.de/fak8/wwm/research/phd_barnoush/hydrogen.pdf
Some site generalises the subject which cannot be put into practice or inyour engg. Take caution, in your understanding of the subject.
http://octane.nmt.edu/waterquality/corrosion/hdamage.htm
http://www.corrosionist.com/Corrosion_Control_Offshore_Oil_Gas.htm
http://hrc.nevada.edu/qa/SIP/SIP-UNR-018R0D0.pdfhttp://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/progress05/v_a_4_adams.pdf

With regards,
Kannan Sundaram

"Owen Jenkins" <owen@osjl.co.uk> Sent by: Tomaterials-welding@googleg <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>roups.com cc
Subject21/04/2009 20:49 [MW:2002]
Re: effect of H on notch strengthPlease respond to materials-welding@googleg roups.com

Ali,The name is Owen, not oven. An oven is something in which you heat food, oroccasionally heat-treat metals!

For hydrogen embrittlement to occur, you must have monatomic hydrogendiffusing through the metal and gathering in grain boundaries. Monatoms ofhydrogen are small enough to diffuse through grains of steel. Theembrittlement occurs as a result of monatomic hydrogen atoms diffusing intothe grain boundaries, reacting to form molecules of hydrogen gas, whichthen force the grains apart. Diffusion and reaction rates both slow withdecreasing temperature, hence the effect of hydrogen embrittlementdecreases below a certain temperature. The effect of the ductile-brittletransition then becomes more important with decreasing temperature. It isalso worth remembering that, at constant pressure, the volume of a givenmass of hydrogen will decrease with temperature, or, at constant volume,the pressure will decrease with decreasing temperature, hence the drivingforce pushing the grains apart will be reduced. If it is too cold for thehydrogen atoms to diffuse through the steel, HE can't occur.

The monatomic hydrogen is commonly formed as a result of acid/metalcorrosion reactions (e.g. pickling steel prior to painting) or otherreactions in which hydrogen is liberated as a cathodic reaction (e.g.fusion welding where water is present or there are hydrogen compounds inthe flux). The hydroxonium (or hydrogen) ions are reduced to monatomichydrogen by electrons from the dissolving (corroding) metal or the weldingcurrent flow. The monatomic gas can diffuse through metal grains - thediatomic gas molecules can't.

2H+ + e- ® 2H.2H. ® H2

Some steels are much more prone to hydrogen embrittlement than others. HSLAand high strength carbon steels tend to be more problematic than others.Hydrogen embrittlement can be prevented by suitable heating to anappropriate temperature after the process which generated the hydrogen (oneof the functions of post-weld heat treatment), to allow the hydrogen todiffuse out of the steel. If you have a properly qualified weld procedure,the PWHT should be designed to mitigate the effects of hydrogenembrittlement.

When HE is suspected in cases of failure, there is never any sign of thehydrogen - it has all long gone, so it is usually inferred from thecircumstances and the nature of the cracks.

Regards,
Owen

Thursday, May 14, 2009

New in Piping field

Welcome Sanjay.

I do not know of any ebook as such to cover the big subject of piping. However you should start with OP Nair's Piping Handbook. And you can also have a read of the B31.3 lite in the below page.

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/piping_valves/files/

Good luck.
Kannan

--- In piping_valves@yahoogroups.com, "sskukade007" <sskukade007@> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I have joined new in piping.
> can you recommend me e books for theory of piping and allied components
> (valves/flanges etc),reference tables,diagrams etc.
> Thanks.
> Sanjay.

Double offset butterfly valve with metal seat

Pl. read catalogs for more understanding.

The subject of seating in double ot triple offset butterfly is litte bigger than other valves due to the emphasis given to the application and operating conditions.

There are quit a few proprietary seat designs. For eg. the graphite layers gets eroded in few weeks to months due to operating condition resulting in big leak and pressure drops. The profile of the seat and disc is also important which developes the cavitation effect and pitting of the seat. So in the selection of a seat the operating condition such as the opening angle, pressure, which in turn will affect the operating pressure in turn the system design itself. So a well thought process is essential in the butterfly valve type and seat selection.

In solid seat the cost makes the big difference.

Regards,
Kannan

--- In piping_valves@yahoogroups.com, "ashoksiva1982" <ashoksiva1982@> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have an enquiry for Double offset butterfly with metal seat. The design pressure shall be 40 bar. Can any one know the seating arrangement of competitor valves.
>
> I got some information from the below link. I need some more arrangement for the above requirements.
>
> http://www.sz-yll.cn/upload/814/200631485558638680174.pdf
>

--- End forwarded message ---

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

US Equivalent of Workstoff Nrs.


The official Beuth's listed equivalent are

1.8963 - ASTM A618 GR.II
1.7218 - ASTM A 29 /A 322 / A 519 GR.4130
1.0037 - ASTM A 36, A 109, A570 GR. 30

Regards,
Kannan.

On 1/12/09, Darji Nilesh (Mumbai - Machinery) <N.Darji@ticb.com> wrote:
 
Dear Friends,
 
Requesting you help to furnish Eq. ASTM Grades for the following material: -
 
1.        1.8963 (Is it better than SA 242 Gr.2 ??)
2.        1.7218 (Required material by Process data sheet is A 1045. Material 1.7218 is better than A 1045 ??)
3.        1.0037 (Required material by Process data sheet is CS-Epoxy painted. Selected material by Vendor is 1.0037, Is it better option ??).
 
Matter is little bit urgent so, kindly furnish your response before noon.
 
With regards,
 
Nilesh.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Branch components.


Firstly, I would like to highlight the word latrolet, weldolet are proprietary names of BF. However it has become synonym in the industry to use those names which is not correct. It is also referred as branch-olets prefixed by 45 deg, 90 deg, etc. not to confuse with proprietary name. Even the ANSI codes do not refer BF names.

Coming to the question, no doubt it is a seamless pipe made reinforced branch fittings. The beveling also looks fine for the profile of the pipe. Being a non standard size, the dimensions have to be verified  with the manufacturer only. But if you ask if forging or pipe made item is acceptable, the answer would be...both can be accepted as the subject is the reinforcing area and cross section thickness.

Additionally, the general opinion is that the BW Reinf.branch fittings has to be used within the available STD, XS, XXS, 160 is not correct. Though being standardized by manufacturer's, we can prescribe actual thickness requirement within B36.10/19 and to std plate thickness. As per my verification all the manufacturer's facility has the flexibility to manufacture the same.
For eg. MEGA a reputed manufacturer in Bergamo, near Milano, Italy is on such vendor. I would say apart from BF, they are the best company with the know-how of  reinforced branch fittings and any other forged components. Their catalog gives a detailed dimension of all types of Rienf. branch fittings for all thickness and diameters of B16.10/19, including the 32".

http://www.mega-spa.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=43

Moreover some forging manufacturers like MAWO fittings in Germany do make special designed branch components which are not really looking like a 'olet nor a coupling and not always forged. Such components have been tested and proved at site and has less material and flexibility in mass manufacturing and of course cheaper than the so called weldolets or sockolets or flangolets etc. And the good part is the B31.3 code do not pose any restriction in such configurations. Pl. take note these components are proprietary of their customers such as BASF, Linde for example.

So I would suggest to use the freedom of the code to invent and design your own new, cheap and economical and ease in welding with reduced fabrication and testing costs by avoiding the cumbersome welding process involved in the BW branch fitting. The best would be as Raghu suggested, the RF pads, but that also has its disadvantages in the operation life span.

Regards,
Kannan.

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING) <R.Bathula@ticb.com> wrote:
Can any one pl. share their experience on large size latrolets? I have not seen latrolet like this shape before, it looks like the vendor has taken a higher thickness pipe and machined to suite the curvature on run pipe. It s 32" x 28" latrolet weighing almost 670 Kg. in absence of catalogue for this size or any dimensional standard really it's impractical to judge whether it is a correct type fitting or not?

Friday, December 12, 2008

KAMOS RTJ Gaskets


I have not used this gasket but heard of this from one of the vendors. To what I understand from him and later discussing after your email, it seems it does reduce the time as you mentioned due to the difference in the method of testing. And as per the vendor this gasket does not have any disadvantage compared with the conventional ones from the operation experience point of view. But the concept is not new as other companies like kroll and Zieller are attempting on such variations.

Another special design gasket is available and being used by some companies like BASF and Statoil. The company is Jungtec, probably a more unfaimliar company. But they have good ideas and working design concepts and good long experience in field, on gaskets. On the subject of leakage after maintenance Jungtec is quit good.
Thier site is http://www.jungtec.de/en/productsoverview.html

For our friends to know more about the subject gasket... http://www.karmsund.no/2.1_kamos_rtj.htm

With regards,
Kannan.



Mohamed Ibrahim <mibrahim_ak@yahoo.com>
Sent by: piping_valves@yahoogroups.com

20/11/2008 15:13

Please respond to
piping_valves@yahoogroups.com

To
piping_valves@yahoogroups.com
cc
kannan.sundaram@linde-le.com
Subject
[piping_valves] KAMOS RTJ Gaskets





Dear Friends,

 
Can you anyone please advise as you have ever used KAMOS RTJ Gaskets in your project as our client TOTAL asked us to see the feasibility to use such Gaskets in our Pipeline Project. Normally these gaskets will allow us to skip the standard leak test,cost reduction and can reduce down-time connected with testing.
 
Best Regards,
 
Ibrahim.

Design standard for ball valve


Dear Nitin,

Unofurtunately I was on leave and took sometime clearing all my personal emails. However it is disappointing our dear members have become more reluctant and lethargic to have discussions mutually benificial.

Coming to the query, to my knowledge of American standards, this size and rating is not covered for the obvious reason being unusual and are yet to be standardised. The solution in your case is to indicate the design to be in acc. with API 6D and F/F to manuf. std. I also have doubt if any manuf. will make a RB valve in that size. So you may have to consider only FB type. For testing of such valves ensure you mix API598 and API 6D to suit the design and service condition as many suppliers practically are unable to meet API 6D creteria for such large size. This is from my inspection experience.

If alternate valve type can be thought about in your application, definitely you should take that change. The key reasons being the maintenance of seats, back flushing, stem packing overhauling is going to be more complicated than any other on/off valve or even a flow control valve. Last but not the least, cost varies in the region of 25 to 40% more. for valves above 32".

So use of ball valves above 28" should have the right reasons.

Regards,
Kannan.



"Hanamapure Nitin \(Mumbai - Piping\)" <N.Hanamapure@ticb.com>
Sent by: piping_valves@yahoogroups.com

07/11/2008 06:55

To
<piping_valves@yahoogroups.com>
cc
Subject
[piping_valves] Design standard for ball valve





Dear all,

I am looking for design standard for 600#, 42” LTCS reduced bore ball valve used in sour service.

Could anyone suggest me the design standard?

Thank you.

Best regards,

Nitin Hanamapure_._,___

Blog visits